New Reverse Onus Offences: When the Accused Must Prove Release Is Justified
July 28, 2026 · Steven D. Norton
Normally the Crown must show why an accused person should be held. In a "reverse onus" case, that burden flips: the accused must show why detention is not justified. Since July 15, 2026, more charges fall into this category.
Newly added reverse onus situations
- Auto theft that is violent or linked to organized crime
- Breaking and entering a home
- Human trafficking and human smuggling
- Assault or sexual assault involving choking, suffocation or strangulation
- Extortion involving violence
- A serious violent offence where the accused has two or more prior convictions for similar offences
The existing reverse onus for offences where violence was used, threatened or attempted with a weapon now looks back 10 years for prior convictions instead of five. The law also creates a reverse onus where the Crown asks to revoke bail after a finding of guilt, pending sentencing.
What this means at the hearing
A reverse onus does not mean bail is impossible. It means the defence has to come prepared with evidence: reliable sureties who testify, a stable residence, a realistic supervision plan, and conditions that directly answer the concerns about the charge. In these cases the plan is not a formality — it is the case.
Sources
Last reviewed against official sources: October 26, 2026. This article is general information, not legal advice. The law may have changed since it was reviewed. Contact a lawyer about your specific situation.

